data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="Best camera 2015 for about $150"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d521/1d5216b70744bcf6498f2853b3dca76f6631ac7f" alt="best camera 2015 for about $150 best camera 2015 for about $150"
Having started my digital camera collection with a $150 HP I canįor $25 more you can get a camera made by Canon, makers of cameras I had a Cannon elph camera and it was the worse camera I ever had, it was defective when I got ity and was in the shop so much that the warranty expired with a defective camera and then the local reapir place wouldnt repair it without my paying them money because the warranty expired and Cannon wouldnt approve the local repair place fixing it, so the camera was completely useless and unusable. The HP 812 has 4 mp and 3x optical zoom plus 7 x digital zoom. The Cannon cameras I have seen at the $100 price point or even the $150 price point are usually 2 mp with digital zoom only. $500 it will still be hard to use at $100. If it wasīecause the camera was difficult to use (for example) when it cost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d90d8/d90d8121c23b2316b67af983f61af18c81528de6" alt="best camera 2015 for about $150 best camera 2015 for about $150"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/475b3/475b309a3d0dc2c75c1e308dc0f31f49f5658887" alt="best camera 2015 for about $150 best camera 2015 for about $150"
See if you can find some sample shots from the cameras, downloadĪnd pay attention to why the camera got a bad review. That is why I was looking at the Fugifilm A210, as it is probably the least expensive 3 megipixel camera with optical zoom on the market.Īs to sample shots would pictures on the internet actually with a cheap monitor and printer show what a photo on paper actually looks like? When people send photos by email they are low megipixel photos whereas photos on paper are high megipixel photos This camera is listed as a business camera geared for professionals not a home camera, but it now cost less than a lot of home cameras. If they are beginners they also might not notice technical color deficiencies and other technical things missing. Also people who buy a camera for $100 might be please with their camera whereas a professional photographer might not be. The thing is that when you pay $500 for a camera you expect certain things that you might not expect from a $100 camera.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e9c9/0e9c9c361d79ecd63b15490c234561a7cfb3387b" alt="best camera 2015 for about $150 best camera 2015 for about $150"
there might have also been some color issues. I think the bad review was to to the opposite of it being difficult to use, they thought it was too simple. A lot of the stuff in the review was complicated professional photography stuff.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="Best camera 2015 for about $150"